October 11, 2008
How, then, should we read the correlation between the rise of Facebook and the decline of porn into the mainstream Web? It is not the usual one that maintains how the Internet is finally put into better use by having less LOLcats and porn. Nor it is the other usual skeptic one that argues that porn is not declining at all, but moving into another realm of the Web, as it were, as mentioned above. My thesis here is much more pessimistic: I would claim that this only proves that we are not only satisfied with externalizing sex so that we do not have to do it (and whenever we do it we need more and more enhancements to keep up with our fantasies and be able to forget the dirty, tiring, awkward parts — dildos, cocaine, viagra, anal beads… — to such extent that there are no longer “real” sex), but that we now find more and more an injunction to externalize our human connections — to “map out [online] every possible human connection” we have, as Mark Zuckerberg famously put it.

“Of Facebook and Porn” (via Viviane, via reversecowgirl)

Is playing with a dildo the same now as drawing a map? Dare I (Melissa) say, the Boffery ethic of sex is to both embrace the awkward parts, and illustrate how definitely connected we are.

  1. boffery reblogged this from reversecowgirl and added:
    reversecowgirl) Is playing with a dildo the same now as drawing a map? Dare I (Melissa) say, the Boffery ethic of sex is...
  2. ncroal reblogged this from reversecowgirl
  3. underpaidgenius reblogged this from reversecowgirl
  4. reversecowgirl posted this